Friday, October 21, 2005

The Wedge

And I quote, from The Wedge Document, as read several times in the Dover trial:. (Emphasis mine.)

"The social consequences of materialism have been devastating. As symptoms, those consequences are certainly worth treating. However, we are convinced that in order to defeat materialism, we must cut it off at its source. That source is scientific materialism. This is precisely our strategy. If we view the predominant materialist science as a giant tree, our strategy is intended to function as a wedge that, while relatively small, can split the trunk when applied at its weakest points. The very beginning of this strategy, the thin edge of the wedge was Phillip Johnson s critique of Darwinism begun in 1991, in Darwinism on Trial, and continued in Reason in the Balance and Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds. Michael Behe's highly successful Darwin's Black Box followed Johnson's work. We are building on this momentum, broadening the wedge with a positive scientific alternative to materialistic scientific theories, which has come to be called the theory of intelligent design. Design theory promises to reverse the stifling dominance of the materialist world view, and to replace it with a science consonant with Christian and theistic convictions."

1 Comments:

Blogger IAMB said...

What I don't get is how Johnson can say that the Wedge Document is no big deal...

He did the same thing when he said that there is currently no scientific theory of ID (duh)... no big deal then, either.

Of course, that's only if you ask him.

Between the first "Pandas" draft, the wedge, Johnson's statement and Behe's flip-flopping, Dover isn't looking too good for the Discovery Institute (though I suspect Ahmanson will continue to pour his money in anyway).

7:12 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home